Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics
Miller argues that, although consent and accountability are basic principles in the theory of democratic representation, the ways in which convention delegates are selected are not designed to implement these principles. Nevertheless, empirical analysis demonstrates that they often do so to varying degrees. Delegates selected in primary elections, Miller finds, are more representative of the ordinary voters than are delegates selected by any other means—except for Democratic super delegates, who are the most representative of all.
Miller's analysis explains why elites who campaign on behalf of particular candidates are less representative of mass policy opinions than are those who campaign on behalf of their parties, and why, ironically, the elites who campaign on behalf of specific policies are even less representative of the issue positions of their parties' rank-and-file partisans.
Without Consent, a sequel to Parties in Transition, makes an important contribution to the literature on theories of representation by its novel analysis of linkages connecting public opinion and public policy through the presidential campaign elites.
About the Author
"Open additional avenues of study and serve as bases for new research undertakings."—The Annals of the American Academy
"It serves as an important contribution to the continually expanding literature on presidential-candidate selection ad end electoral behavior."—The Annals of the American Academy
Other Titles from Blazer Lectures
Other Titles in POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Campaigns & Elections