Paperback / softback
March 16, 2018
9.00 Inches (US)
6.00 Inches (US)
.69 Pounds (US)
$34.95 USD
v2.1 Reference

Revolution and Continuity

Essays in the History and Philosophy of Early Modern Science

Edited by Peter Barker and Roger Ariew
This volume presents new work in history and historiography to the increasingly broad audience for studies of the history and philosophy of science. These essays are linked by a concern to understand the context of early modern science in its own context. The papers presented in this volume form four goups. The first two essays address historiographical questions concerning the role of institutions such as universities and scientific academies in the founding of modern science. Mordecahi Feingold substantially qualifies the thesis that universities were the centers of resistance to the new science. David Lux examines the pervasive influence of Martha Ornstein's work concerning 17th-century scientific societies. The second group of essays extends the range of historical studies into generally neglected areas of science. Harold Cook's essay provides an entry into a range of issues connecting medicine and other sciences. Roger Ariew's paper reminds us that astronomy and physics were by no means the exclusive interests of those now remembered as founders of modern physics. The third section of essays is in more traditional areas of interest to historicans and philosophers of science but offers distinctly novel conclusions. Alan Gabbey provides the first modern treatment of a central problem in heliocentric astronomy and cosmology - the nature of the moon's motion. Jospeh Pitt offers a unique picture of the relationship between Bellarmine and Galileo. Bernard Goldstein punctures one of the great myths of the Copernican revolution: Alfonso of Castile's supposed dissatisfaction with the Ptolemaic tradition. Finally, the last group presents papers on early modern mathematics. Francois de Gandt examines Cavalieri's mathematical practice during the period of the development of calculus. Emily Grosholz considers the mathematical practice of Descartes and demonstrates that Descartes' own mathematical ideals were an impediment to the full utilization of the mathematical resources exploited by his successors.

9780813230689 : revolution-and-continuity-barker-ariew
Paperback / softback
222 Pages
$34.95 USD

Other Titles from Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy

Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas III

John F. Wippel
May 2021 - The Catholic University of America Press
$65.00 USD - Hardback

The Art of Conjecture

Clyde Lee Miller
Mar 2021 - The Catholic University of America Press
$75.00 USD - Hardback

Beauty and the Good

edited by Alice M. Ramos
Nov 2020 - The Catholic University of America Press
$75.00 USD - Hardback

Other Titles in PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern

The Catholic Enlightenment

edited by Ulrich L. Lehner, Shaun Blanchard
Aug 2021 - The Catholic University of America Press
$34.95 USD - Paperback / softback

Metaphysical Disputation I

translated by Shane Duarte, Francisco Suarez
Jun 2021 - The Catholic University of America Press
$69.95 USD - Hardback

Revolutionary Jews from Spinoza to Marx

Jonathan I. Israel
Jun 2021 - University of Washington Press
$39.95 USD - Hardback