Just War Reconsidered
Strategy, Ethics, and Theory
In Just War Reconsidered: Strategy, Ethics, and Theory, James M. Dubik draws on years of research as well as his own experiences as a soldier and teacher to fill the gaps left by other theorists. He applies moral philosophy, political philosophy, and strategic studies to historical and contemporary case studies to reveal the inaccuracies and moral bankruptcy that inform some of the literature on military ethics. Conventional just war theory adopts a binary approach, wherein political leaders have moral accountability for the decision to go to war and soldiers have accountability for fighting the war ethically. Dubik argues, however, that political and military leadership should be held accountable for the planning and execution of war in addition to the decision to initiate conflict.
Dubik bases his sober reassessment on the fundamental truth that war risks the lives of soldiers and innocents as well as the political and social health of communities. He offers new standards to evaluate the ethics of warfare in the hope of increasing the probability that the lives of soldiers will not be used in vain and the innocent not put at risk unnecessarily.
About the Authors
"Just War Reconsidered examines a timeless topic: moral leadership at the strategic level of war. Dubik's five principles for waging war justly provide a framework for judging the moral agency of senior leaders, civilian and military, in their war-waging responsibilities."—Lance Betros, author of Carved from Granite: West Point since 1902
"Just War Reconsidered will surprise, discomfort, and ultimately enlighten those interested in how the nation wields the military instrument of power. Dubik challenges us to understand and confront not only our responsibility to fight wars ethically but also to wage wars ethically."—from the foreword by General Martin E. Dempsey, USA (Ret.),Eighteenth Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
"In this book, remarkable for its intellectual bravery and originality, General Jim Dubik shows that he is truly one of the most thoughtful, ethical, and excellent field officers of his generation. His analysis will leave many uncomfortable—but in a very good and necessary way. Coming out of the wars of the early 21st century, the United States and its military and policymakers and citizenry need to wrestle with the issues that Dubik explores so well."—Michael O'Hanlon, senior fellow, Brookings Institution
"Dr. Dubik has given us a powerful reflection on a troubling time in American history, with a clarion call for a moral foundation for national action using military force."—John Hamre, former Deputy Secretary of Defense
"Dubik's new book, Just War Considered, examines conduct in war not in traditional terms of the morality of war, or a given war, per se, nor from a primarily tactical point of view, e.g., whether civilian casualties can be justified, but from a new perspective—the morality of executing strategies not capable of meeting the war aims. Given America's experience in most major ground wars since World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, this perspective is profoundly useful. Diplomats and statesmen and stateswomen will benefit from his insights as much as military officers, as the ultimate determination of war aims is a civilian responsibility, and determining the proper strategy to execute it a combined military-civilian endeavor. I wish we had such insights before we took fateful decisions on Vietnam Jeffreyand Iraq."—Ambassador James Jeffrey
"Although much has been written about the ethics of fighting wars, much less attention has been paid to the ethical responsibilities of senior military and political leaders who plan those wars. This work, written by a distinguished general with vast experience across a range of American conflicts, remedies this omission. Clearly written and persuasively argued, Just War Reconsidered will be treasured by ethicists, historians and the interested public."—Steven R. David, Johns Hopkins University
"Just War Reconsidered is an important book at a critical time. James Dubik helps us not only understand the problem of contemporary war, but also how we might prevent it or at least make war less inhumane. It is a book for soldiers, political leaders, and citizens. The author makes clear that the understanding of war is foundational to the making of strategy, maintaining the requirements for national defense, and the moral conduct of an inherently political and human activity."—H. R. McMaster, author of Dereliction of Duty, Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Lies that Led to Vietnam
"Dubik combines his philosopher's wisdom with his experience as a combat soldier and commander. The argument brilliantly bridges both worlds. This wise, thoughtful, and beautifully written book explores the profound question of justice in the conduct of war. It recognizes, with Clausewitz, that war is an extension of politics by other means, that it is by nature riddled with chance and ambiguity, and that civilian and military leaders share responsibility for ensuring that war is waged justly. It is a profound contribution to scholarship, citizenship, and leadership."—Kimberly Kagan, President,
Institute for the Study of War
"Just War Reconsidered is an ambitious and provocative book. [It] offers a compelling challenge to the existing civil-military debate."—Parameters
"Just War Reconsidered is a fantastic, wellreasoned, wellsupported argument for viewing civilmilitary relations through an ethical lens.
Ultimately, Dubik makes a sound argument that to accept a distinct line between political and military activities during war is to miss the clear moral relevance of waging war properly. Yet he not only highlights this deficiency; he also proposes a solution.
Dubik proposes a model that challenges not only political and military leaders to dialogue, but also requires the massive government bureaucracies to executeboth areas which have been problematic since the wars began. This book is most applicable to senior military and political professionals as well as the bureaucracies they lead. The lives of citizensturnedsoldiers are at stake and it is the moral responsibility of all involved in the decision and execution processes to ensure that aims, strategies, and policies are well reasoned and well executed."—H-War
"By reviewing the rich body of literature on war waging and war fighting, laying out the logical development of his arguments, illustrating those arguments with historical examples of both success and failure, and concluding with key principles to be observed, [Dubik] has formulated a fresh view on what it takes for senior leaders (an entity he also defines in detail) to meet their moral obligations in war. It is an original work, neatly condensing all that has come before and synthesizing that into a framework that "increases the probability of success in waging war.""—Foreign Policy
"A thought-provoking and well-reasoned analysisa timely study that should be required reading for all military and political leaders who are responsible for the conduct of warfare at the strategic level."—Army History
"James Dubik's Just War Reconsidered uses just war theory as a lens to examine the political and moral responsibility of military officers and policy makers at the strategic and operational level of war. Dubik illustrates his points with examples drawn from the Civil War, World War II, Vietnam, both Iraq wars, and Afghanistan, with a strong emphasis on the most recent conflicts. [A] powerful and provocative book."—Air University
Other Titles from Battles and Campaigns Series
Other Titles in HISTORY / Military / General